The following are a list of nominees for Visual Effects
Life of Pi
Bill Westenhofer, Guillaume Rocheron, Erik-Jan De Boer and Donald R. Elliott
Bill Westenhofer, Guillaume Rocheron, Erik-Jan De Boer and Donald R. Elliott
Marvel’s The Avengers
Janek Sirrs, Jeff White, Guy Williams and Dan Sudick
Janek Sirrs, Jeff White, Guy Williams and Dan Sudick
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey
Joe Letteri, Eric Saindon, David Clayton and R. Christopher White
Joe Letteri, Eric Saindon, David Clayton and R. Christopher White
Snow White and the Huntsman
Cedric Nicolas-Troyan, Philip Brennan, Neil Corbould and Michael Dawson
Cedric Nicolas-Troyan, Philip Brennan, Neil Corbould and Michael Dawson
Prometheus
Richard Stammers, Trevor Wood, Charley Henley and Martin Hill
Richard Stammers, Trevor Wood, Charley Henley and Martin Hill
All the nominees chosen represented excellent work. Prometheus, which fended off harsh criticism from fans and critics alike for being needlessly confusing, was visually very interesting but nothing in the film stood out as innovative or oscar calibre. What was stand out in that film for me as a viewer was that the filmmaker used a lot of location photography to depict the alien landscape as opposed to creating virtual environments which are technically somewhat of a mixed bag.
Marvel's Avenger was also visually satisfying and the technicians finally got the CGI Hulk to work after two moderately successful attempts. Avengers is at times overwhelming in its visual content. I didn't feel much of a connect to the characters as I was awash in the relentless tide of CGI debris and explosions and alien onslaught that seem to be on a continuous loop.
The Hobbit, also well made and entertaining, offered nothing new or engaging in terms of it's visuals. It didn't seem to me that the film artists at WETA digital had made any considerable leaps in tech advancement or even art direction since their last Middle Earth outing nearly 7 years ago. It just seemed like more of the same gritty, earthy nirvana from Peter Jackson...running from Goblins, running from Trolls, large sweeping vistas etc, etc...the brief glimpse of Smaug the Dragon at the film end does promise some interesting visuals in the future installments. Snow White similarly also seemed to me more of the same CG "off- the -shelf" software solution to visual effects. For me the winner in this lot was Life of Pi. It took chances with the visual material and manage to make the CG animals believable and menacing. As I was watching the film it occurred to me that animal trainers will no longer be needed for films (provided the producers have the money to afford the expense of quality CGI). My prediction is Life of Pi will take the award.
This could be a great article Cool, maybe even two articles.
ReplyDeleteWith the Devil’s Advocate assignment, we are moving into thesis territory. Your thesis should be front and center. What is your thesis here? You’ve written a good first draft to find it.
This should be your headline:
Oscar nominees for visual effects lack innovation.
Or this should be your headline:
Life of Pi should win the Oscar for visual effects.
Don’t bury your lead. Once you write that first draft, look at what you are trying to say and go back and say it, up front. Don’t be shy about your opinion. Don't be hesitant.
Also watch your formatting. By cutting and pasting the list of nominees from another source, you changed your font. You don’t need the list at all. Make your thesis/headline and then go though the nominees paragraph by paragraph.
Give me a substantial article in which you really tear each nominee apart and find the good and the bad in each one.
I would also like to see Cool’s Top Five Picks for Innovative Visual Effects 2012, if none of these fit the marquee.
Bob (Prof Kalm)